Women Misbehavin'

Well behaved women never make history

Archive for November, 2009

From PUSH to Precious

Posted by joyinhome on November 13, 2009

I first read PUSH about 10 years ago; it was recommended by my godmother. If you have not read the book, I highly recommend it.

The buzz around the movie, Precious, has been overall very positive. However, there are some people who are not planning to see it because of the topics into which it delves. I read an article this morning (that annoyed me) about why the author, an African-American woman, would not be going to see it.

PUSH deals with some difficult, sickening and gritty issues that are painful and exhausting but at the end of the day, we sometimes have to explore ugliness to find the beautiful opportunity.

I have not yet seen the movie version but plan to- probably this weekend. I wanted to go opening weekend, but was unable to do so. However, I am glad to see its initial financial and critical success.

Stay tuned for my post after seeing Precious.

Posted in Diversity, Families, Feminism | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Military Caregivers Get More Time Off

Posted by espressodog on November 13, 2009

hunky male veteranAs of October 29, families of both wounded veterans and active service members can access 26 weeks of unpaid leave to care for their wounded family member. In 2008, Congress approved the first ever expansion of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) extending leave to family members caring for wounded service members or a family member preparing for deployment. This year, Congress expanded the military family leave provision of the FMLA to a more broadly defined category of military family members.

Congress moved with surprising speed this year to pass legislation to expand the situations in which an employee may take military caregiver leave under FMLA. The “Supporting Military Families Act of 2009″ was introduced in the House and Senate in late July. It was then attached to the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2010, which passed both houses of Congress and was signed by the President on October 28.

The 2008 expansion of FMLA established two forms of military-related FMLA leave — exigency leave and military caregiver leave. Exigency leave was originally limited to families of National Guard or Reserves members. It is now available to families of all active duty service members. Military caregiver leave was originally limited to families of current service members. It is now available to families of wounded veterans as well. The 2009 expansion also expands the potential period during which FMLA caregiver leave might be provided. Now, eligible employees may take FMLA caregiver leave for up to five years after the veteran ends active duty. This addresses an employees’ need to take leave to care for a veteran whose service-connected injury or illness first manifested itself after the service member became a veteran. These changes are effective immediately

Provisions of the recently passed Supporting Military Families Act include:

  • Employees will be entitled to take military caregiver leave to care for family members who were injured on active duty in the military for up to five years after their separation from military service. Currently, military caregiver leave is available only to care for injured family members who are still in the military.
  • Military caregiver leave will also be allowed when the family member suffered from a preexisting serous injury or illness that was aggravated by his or her active duty service in the military. Under the current U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) regulations, employees aren’t entitled to leave under these circumstances.
  • Employees will be entitled to qualifying exigency leave when a family member who is in the regular armed forces is deployed to a foreign country. Currently, such leave is available only when a family member is called to active duty in the National Guard or military reserves.
  • Qualifying exigency leave will be available when the employee’s family member is a member of the National Guard or military reserves and called to active duty in a foreign country. The requirement that service members be called to active duty “in a foreign country” replaces the current requirement that they be called to active duty “in support of a contingency operation.”

Employers that are covered by the FMLA will need to notify employees of the changes and revise their policies and procedures to ensure that they are in compliance with these new requirements. FMLA applies to all public agencies, including state, local and federal employers, local education agencies (schools), and private-sector employers who employed 50 or more employees. The family member taking this form (or any form) of FMLA leave must be an “eligible employee,” meaning that the employee has worked for the employer for at least 12 months, has worked at least 1,250 hours in the 12-month period preceding the leave, and works at a worksite with at least 50 employees within 75 miles of the site.

Posted in Uncategorized, Worklife Balance | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Do Unto Others…

Posted by joyinhome on November 13, 2009

catholic_priest_1024x768Okay. So I needed a day to cool off and reflect before writing this…

Let me preface by saying that I was raised in Catholicism. [For some reason, people feel better and believe you more credible if you belong to the group about which you are critical.]

I am APPALLED by the Catholic Church (and this of course is not the first time)! Yesterday, the Archdiocese of Washington threatened to pull its social service programs that serve D.C. residents if the D.C. Council approves the same-sex marriage law that is up for a vote next month.

Now, let’s put aside personal feelings on gay rights, how that makes you feel, your interpretation of whatever Holy Book you follow. The Catholic Church is playing politics and it is ugly.

The claim has been made that the Church does not want to provide partner benefits to its employees which would uphold something that goes against its belief system. Do not pee on my head and tell me it’s raining! Providing health benefits to employees has nothing to do with social services provided by Catholic Charities.

Social outreach is an important tenant of the Catholic Church which defines its mission as “spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ, administering the sacraments and exercising charity.” Catholic Charities of DC services about 70,000 residents, the majority of services dedicated to homeless individuals and families in crisis. Clients receive services at 88 locations throughout the District of Columbia and five Maryland counties.

The Church knows what impact this would have on the residents of a small city during a recession with high unemployment and budget shortfalls and cuts in services. These are strong-arm tactics and if they weren’t entrenched in hatred, I might be a bit impressed.

Honestly, I should not be surprised, the Catholic Church has never been inclusive- of women, people of color or anybody “different.” But to revoke much-needed support for people when they need it most belies the very core of what any church or religion should symbolize.

“Catholic” is derived from the Greek word meaning universal… oh, the irony.

Catholic Charities’ Open letter to the community.
Maybe It’s God ADW blog

Let the Catholic Church know that help should not come with the price of exclusion. Email Susan Gibbs of the Archdiocese at sgibbs@adw.org or send a message to Catholic Charities.

Posted in Diversity, Families, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 3 Comments »

What’s Really Behind the Scandals

Posted by egehl on November 10, 2009

Oh those tawdry office affairs.  They certainly have garnered quite a bit of attention lately with comedian David Letterman and ESPN sports fanatic Steve Phillips.  Office romances are as old as the dark ages and they certainly won’t end anytime soon because of sensationalistic media stories.  However they do bring up larger issues about the role of power in the workplace, and who holds it.

Recently one of the few women to write for the Late Show in the 80’s discussed the sexually charged, toxic workplace.  In a Vanity Fair piece, she talked about the rumors she heard regarding Letterman and other high-level male employees having sexual affairs with female staffers.  She felt that the women involved in the affairs had access to information otherwise out of reach, and that they wielded greater power disproportionate to their job title.  As a result, she felt demeaned in a hostile work environment and left the show abruptly. qq1sgOfficeRomance

With people working longer hours and spending more time with their coworkers, office relationships are inevitable.  However it’s when issues of power and authority come into play that women start to be on the losing end.  Power is the greatest aphrodisiac, which is certainly evident in the political world with the fallout of many male politicians over the past few years.  Bosses sleeping with their subordinates won’t change.  However what can change is the disproportionate number of male bosses.  

Like many offices nationwide, late-night writing staffs have long been a boys club.  In 27 years, Late Night and the Late Show have hired only seven female writers.  It supports other statistics about women lagging behind men when it comes to positions of leadership and power.  Women make up about half of all associates at law firms, but only 15 percent of partners.  Moreover, women hold about half the jobs in the U.S., but make up only 15.7 percent of corporate officers and executive managers, 15.2 percent of boards of directors, and 3 percent of CEOs. This imbalance causes women to feel demeaned and leave their job, and makes for a potent mix that can spur incidents of sexism and sexual harassment in the workplace. 

Regardless of fewer women holding leadership positions, it’s not that the tables should be turned to gain better balance between the sexes.  As written by Kate Daily in Newsweek, “This is not to say that I think female bosses sleeping with their male interns would be a true symbol of gender equity, or that women are so virtuous and men so vile. But much of the imbalance that makes tawdry office affairs more commonplace comes from the reality that the men at a company have more authority than the women: the power to hire and fire, the power to make or break careers, the power to move up the ladder at a faster clip.” 

The sexual scandal between David Letterman and his female staffers, while disappointing and shocking, brings up a larger issue about the lack of women in power in offices nationwide. The unequal dynamic can cause female workers to feel devalued and perceived to work less because of their lower position.  In addition, many women feel that they must flirt and play up their looks to get noticed and have their ideas heard.

More female bosses would help to demystify this perception that women employees have to show off their sexuality to get noticed and move ahead.  It would also address the abuse of power continually shown by men in executive positions spurred by the fact that most women hold positions of lesser privilege.
 
Workplaces like late night comedy shows with mostly men in positions of power should reevaluate their hiring practices and make a concerted effort to build genuine diversity.  I have no doubt there are many qualified, talented female writers out there. 

As the former writer from the Late Show says, her impetus for speaking up was not to bring shame onto David Letterman but instead to encourage him “to hire some qualified female writers and then treat them with respect”.  If something positive could come out of this scandal, I believe that would be it.

Posted in Career Advancement, Diversity, Successful Workplaces | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Working Woman Does Her Job: Thank You Officer Munley

Posted by sherrysaunders on November 6, 2009

Sergeant KIMBERLY-MUNLEY-largeKimberly Munley was at work directing traffic at Ft. Hood with her partner when they heard shots and ran towards the sound rather than away.  From news reports we learned that she confronted the gunman and shot him four times while being wounded herself.  Authorities said Officer Munley fired on the suspect just three minutes after the gunfire began, and base officials said her efforts ended the crisis. She is currently at a hospital and in stable condition.  Last night she called friends to say she was OK.

Various news sources reported that Lt. Gen. Robert Cone, the base commander said, “It was an amazing and aggressive performance by this police officer.”

I don’t think anyone can question her valor or her level headedness during this crisis.  It does seem ironic that at a time when there is an ongoing debate about whether women can serve in combat, this young woman entered what could only be called a combat zone and did her job.

While the nation morns those who lost their lives and those who were wounded at Ft. Hood yesterday, we also would like to acknowledge and thank Kimberly Munley, a working woman doing her job.

Posted in Diversity, Families, Feminism | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

No Support for Non Profits in the Healthcare Debate

Posted by egehl on November 4, 2009

social-workEvery day millions of women work for a nonprofit organization or receive vital services from one.  Women depend on nonprofits to deliver a steady paycheck, child care, affordable food, housing, medical care, domestic violence assistance and many other services that provide an important social safety net for our communities.

Nonprofits are predominantly small employers and are facing serious challenges in providing and affording health care coverage for their employees.  Unfortunately, regardless of the role nonprofits play in our nation’s economy and the welfare of our citizens, the sector has been lost in the overall health care dialogue.  As a result, they are at risk of not receiving adequate support in the final health care legislation.

Nonprofits have suffered from the economic crisis like every sector.  Over the past year, organizations have faced escalating operating costs, decreased revenues from all types of funders and increased demand for more services.  As a result, nonprofits have had to re-evaluate their operations and lay off employees.  Ironically, at a time when nonprofits need to provide more services to our most vulnerable citizens, they cannot with the potent combination of decreased revenue and sky rocketing health care premiums.

Unaffordable health care puts an even greater pressure on the nonprofit sector, which is why it’s vital that nonprofits receive the relief they deserve from Congress.

Nonprofits bring value to all of our communities every day.  The economic viability of nonprofit organizations is critical to sustaining a healthy, vibrant citizenry in strong communities. Nonprofit organizations provide a wide spectrum of services that touch every person’s life in one way or the other.  They provide support to our most vulnerable populations, and many of those clients are women and children who depend on various programs to survive.  If nonprofits suffer and have to downsize services because they do not receive equivalent relief as other sectors, thousands of women will be impacted nationwide.

For decades, nonprofits have struggled to attract a talented pool of employees.  Part of this is their inability to provide competitive wages and benefit packages that can attract capable applicants who will grow within the sector.  Nonprofits want to pay their employees a living wage and decent benefits, but with the increasing costs of health care it has gotten much harder. A critical component of any benefits package is health care so if policymakers fail to recognize and address the needs of nonprofits the damage to the sector and its female employees could be long lasting.

Together, nonprofits employ nearly 13 million individuals–almost 10 percent of the U.S. workforce–who are integral to the vital services these organizations provide to communities throughout the nation.  Nonprofit employees are predominantly female and depend on their employers to provide adequate, affordable health care coverage.  However without appropriate health insurance subsidies from Congress, nonprofits will have to either cut benefits to their employees, stall wages in order to afford benefits, or cut back on needed services.

In the end, nonprofit employees suffer financially, organizations lose capable staff and nonprofit clients get denied the services they need.  Nonprofits feel the health care cost squeeze much like small business and need equivalent support.  Among the 30 million uninsured people, many of them are working for small nonprofit employers that cannot afford insurance.  According to the Urban Institute of the 984,386 registered nonprofits nationwide, 82.3% (810,149) have budgets of $500,000k or less. Therefore most nonprofits have small budgets and according to the Johns Hopkins University Listening Post Project, only 46 percent of small nonprofits offer health benefits to their employees.

Nonprofits are a significant piece of our nation’s small businesses.  Yet with all of the attention small business has garnered throughout the health care reform debate, nonprofits have been completely left out of the dialogue. Policymakers and the media have failed to acknowledge this important sector of the workforce.  Because nonprofits are predominately small employers, they suffer from the same challenges as small business even with a different tax status.

Fortunately through the hard work of nonprofit advocates, some headway has been made in getting nonprofits included into reform legislation.  The Senate Finance Committee included in their completed bill a tax credit amendment that would allow charitable organizations with 25 or fewer employees to be eligible to apply the tax credit against the organization’s payroll taxes withheld from its employees.  Nonprofits would be eligible for a 25% credit from 2011-2013 and a 35% credit in 2013 to help provide quality, affordable health insurance to their workers.

The Senate Finance Committee amendment is a viable way for Congress to support the sector.  At the very least, it recognizes the role nonprofits play in our nation’s economy and their need for health care relief.  Unfortunately the proposed comprehensive House health care bill does not include a nonprofit amendment and leaves the sector out.  As a result, nonprofit advocates will be monitoring whether this amendment gets included into the final Senate bill and not lost during the final Conference Committee process.

Nonprofits must be innovative and diversify their funding to stay financially solvent, but at the same time the federal government must be a supportive partner.  Nonprofits should not be dismissed by policymakers, but instead embraced for their immeasurable value.  And the health care debate is a prime opportunity for federal policymakers to recognize the unique and important role nonprofits play in our society.

Nonprofits are naturally resilient and nimble because they have to be in order to survive.  However their tenacity can be pushed only so far.  They can be crippled by health care costs like any other sector and now is the time to send a clear warning signal to Congress.  As the debate continues to rage on, nonprofits want to see the federal government showcase their support of the sector by explicitly including them into the final health care reform bill.

This post is a part of the National Women’s Law Center “Women Blog for Health Care 2009

photo credit

Posted in Economy, Health, Successful Workplaces | Leave a Comment »

Women Benefit from Expanded Hate Crimes Law

Posted by egehl on November 2, 2009

Last week President Obama made a bold statement against hate crimes by signing into law legislation that will help protect citizens against bias based on who they are, what they look like, who they love and how they pray.

The current law, enacted four decades ago, limits federal jurisdiction over hate crimes to assaults based on race, color, religion or national origin.  The newly signed bill will broaden current law and make it a federal crime when an assault or attack occurs because of a victim’s sexual orientation, gender identity or disability.  With the stroke of a pen, women have exanded rights under the hate crimes law. hate-crime-poster

It’s long overdue that our country makes it a federal crime to assault an individual based on his or her sexual orientation or gender identity.  Crimes motivated by prejudice and dislike about a group of people must not be tolerated.  A hate crime is defined as a crime of violence that is motivated by hatred of the group to which the victim belongs.  Typically hate crimes are done at least partly and sometimes mainly directed at the victim’s community.  It involves violence and sometimes death, and usually occurs at an unpredictable time and location.  Victims are randomly selected by their perpetrators based on something the perpetrator abhors or finds disturbing.

The new hate crimes law will give equal protection to persons of all genders, races, colors, nationalities, religions, sexual orientations, gender identities, and degrees of disability if they experience a hate crime against them.  The bill will also lift a requirement that a victim has to be attacked while engaged in a federally protected activity, like attending school, for it to be a federal hate crime.

Since the death of Matthew Shepard, who was brutally beaten and killed because he was gay over 10 years ago, the issue of hate crimes has not been adequately addressed for the gay community.  The passage of this legislation will give the Justice Department and state and local governments the tools they need to deter and prosecute acts of violence toward all groups of people who experience discrimination. 

Opponents of the new law claim it infringes upon our First Amendment rights.   However freedom of speech, even hate speech, is protected under the First Amendment.  Hate crimes legislation only targets actions that are criminal acts based on bias, as opposed to the prosecution of speech based on controversial beliefs. 

In addition, opponents claim that current federal and state laws and regulations are adequate enough.  This viewpoint is narrow minded and does not take into consideration that a crime directed toward someone based on their identity breaks down our social fabric and segments the population in a very negative way.  Specific laws directed toward hate crimes is needed because hate motivated crime is special.  Hatred is directed at an entire community in addition to the immediate victim.  And in order to prevent these types of acts from happening people must know that they could face federal prosecution. 

Mathew Shepard’s family and others that have experienced the loss of a loved one due to violent, discriminatory acts have fought hard for this important first step. Everyday too many people are being devastated by senseless hatred.  I applaud President Obama for signing this legislation into law and sending a message that our country will not tolerate cowardly and inhumane acts against people’s identity.

Posted in Advocacy, Diversity, Lifestyle | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 105 other followers